Posts Tagged ‘Economic Conditions’

Smart Equipment Leasing: Comparing Bank Financing With Leasing Companies

Saturday, December 19th, 2009

by Tom Williams

Savvy business owners who choose to lease business equipment can save themselves hard-earned cash, accumulated debt, and industrial-strength headaches by optimizing their relationships with lending entities.

Customers who are looking to lease equipment for their business most frequently seek financing from one of two sources – traditional bank financing programs, or specialized leasing companies like eLease. The following are four key differences to consider when comparing these programs.

1. Interest Rate Fluctuations

In a healthy economy, banks often choose to offer equipment leasing as a service for their business clients. In this way, banks foster economic growth in local communities by supporting expansion in growing industries. However, banks are not in the business of taking risks, and because of this, their programs are subject to change as current economic conditions falter.

An example of this is interest rates. Consistent with their conservative risk philosophy, banks do not entertain risk with interest rates. Typically, bank lines fluctuate on the Prime Rate — as the Federal Reserve raises or lowers the rate, so will your interest payment increase or decrease. These economic fluctuations can have financial impact on your business outside of your control.

The opposite is true for leasing companies, because they take 100% of the interest rate risk. Therefore, when industry rates decrease or increase, your lease payment stays the same. The payment on a lease will never change during its term regardless of interest rates and inflation. You know what you are getting from day one.

 

2. Impact on Additional Financing

The way that your financing source reports your leased business equipment with the Secretary of State can directly impact your ability to obtain additional financing for your business.

When your business equipment is financed by a third-party leasing company, that company files a UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) which specifies to the Secretary of State where the customer is located, and that the leased equipment is owned by the leasing company. For example, if your business makes the decision to lease an oven for your new restaurant, a leasing company would designate the oven itself as collateral.

In comparison, all property owned by the business is stated when a bank finances the lease. A Blanket UCC is usually filed, which includes the equipment as well as all assets. Therefore, not only would the oven for your new restaurant be considered collateral, but so would your entire business.

When a blanket UCC is in place, other banks will not want to provide overlapping financing with another lender. If, however, your financing is provided through a third-party leasing company, other lenders will see that only equipment is under consideration, and be favorable to loan financing because they will be able to Blanket UCC the rest of the business.

3. Access to Capital

Both banks and leasing companies evaluate exposure (the total amount of debt taken on by a company) when considering whether to offer financing. The difference in the way these entities look at total debt can have significant influence on their decision to finance your equipment, as well as other financed assets.

In most cases, banks have a borrowing threshold with a borrower. This may include the line of credit on the home, auto loans, credit cards, business debts and personal mortgage. If you get into an amount of debt that the bank sees as a risk, they may choose to end business with your company. Or, they may refuse you financing due to how much debt your already have.

Leasing companies deal with the same issue, but only consider the equipment financed for that customer. So, by using a third party leasing company, you can retain access to capital with your banker without tying up credit lines. A business can never have too much access to capital!

4. Flexibility in Terms

Most banks are highly structured and cautious in their leasing terms. Frequently, they require 10% to 20% down to finance equipment for a business, with a requirement of security such as a minimum amount in a CD, or reserve in a checking account.

While the primary objective of a bank is to protect its interests, a leasing company’s main goal is to generate cash flow. Therefore, leasing companies are highly creative in finding the easiest way for a business to get new equipment. It is not uncommon to terms that include seasonal payments, or no payments for 90 to 180 days.

 

In summary, a good rule of thumb is to use your bank for working capital, and equipment finance companies to finance equipment.

 

 

Tom Williams is President and CEO of eLease.com. eLease provides medical”>http://www.elease.com/3763/Medical-Equipment.html”>medical equipment leasing and financing, as well as equipment leasing and financing to a wide variety of businesses and industries. It can be found on the web at www.elease.com

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Practical Alternatives For Commercial Finance Funding

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

When faced with business finance funding decisions, it is essential for business owners to determine their practical and effective alternatives. In the face of recent volatile conditions impacting financial markets, this will not be an easy task. For example, there has been much misinformation and confusion about the true availability of commercial financing throughout the United States. Getting more accurate information about what is realistically possible can be one of the most difficult challenges for commercial borrowers.

Even for business owners who are satisfied with their current commercial finance funding arrangements, it is advisable to explore business financing options that might be necessary if economic conditions change further. The use of Plan B contingency financing is an important tool to assist commercial borrowers in this process.

There are a number of harsh realities which must be confronted by all commercial borrowers when assessing their realistic options in the current challenging commercial finance funding climate. There are several factors which will have an immediate impact on which financing alternatives can be considered. First, unsecured lines of credit are rapidly disappearing for many businesses because commercial lenders are eliminating or reducing this kind of working capital financing. Second, many regional banks have decided to stop or reduce their lending activities involving commercial mortgages and other commercial loans. Third, commercial construction financing is available on a very limited basis. Fourth, businesses which are not currently profitable or not current in their debt payments will encounter particular difficulties in seeking new funding. Fifth, many lenders are requiring more collateral for any new commercial loans.

The primary message of this article is to emphasize the importance for commercial borrowers of being more realistic when seeking new financing or refinancing. As noted above, there are some stark changes which now impact almost all new commercial loans. Despite these new and difficult challenges, most business owners will still be able to obtain new financing, although it is very likely that either the terms or kind of financing will be different from previous business financing arrangements.

For example, even though working capital loans are not as widely available as they were just a few months ago, this kind of commercial financing is still in fact obtainable. The main change for business borrowers is the likelihood that they will be dealing with a different commercial lender, since some of the largest providers have stopped making these loans. Furthermore, the lenders which are currently most willing to consider working capital funding are not aggressively promoting these particular financing activities.

Business cash advance programs which are based on credit card processing activity are another example of an increasingly practical commercial financing option in the midst of an uncertain economy. Although this business funding option has been available for several years, it has not been utilized by most small business owners. For most businesses which accept credit cards, business cash advances should be evaluated as an important tool for improving business cash flow. Commercial borrowers wanting to consider this financing alternative should consult with a commercial finance funding expert who is knowledgeable about both this specialized kind of working capital financing as well as commercial real estate loans and other commercial loans.

Steve Bush is a commercial financing expert – business finance funding programs at AEX Commercial Loans and Business Cash Advances

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.6.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.